This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Short, M. Articles by Wynne, M. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Revisiting the notion of faithfulness in discourse presentation using a corpus approach

Lancaster University, UK, m.short/e.semino{at}lancaster.ac.uk

Elena Semino

Lancaster University, UK, m.short/e.semino{at}lancaster.ac.uk

Martin Wynne

University of Oxford, UK, wynne{at}ota.ahds.ac.uk

A number of recent studies have argued that the notion of faithfulness to an original should be abandoned in models of discourse presentation, and particularly in accounts of direct speech presentation. This has coincided with a shift of attention in the study of discourse presentation from written to spoken data. This article discusses the arguments that have been made against the notion of faithfulness, and proposes a context-sensitive account of this notion, and of its relation to the various clines of discourse presentation and their categories. Our account is prompted partly by the results of a corpus-based approach to the study of discourse presentation, and partly by a qualitative analysis of a set of newspaper articles on a particular news story from outside this corpus, which we undertook to provide a check on the conclusions we had reached from our corpus study. We believe that if a general account of discourse presentation is to be reached, similarities and differences across a wide range of texts and text types need to be examined. Our corpus work, which involves careful and systematic comparison of a balanced set of written fictional, news and (auto)biographical narratives, is offered as a contribution to the general account referred to above. We also believe that if such a general account or theory is to be reached, scholars will need a clearer and more consistent application of the various descriptive terms which have been used in this area of study during the 20th century, in particular (a) ‘discourse’, (b) ‘speech’, ‘thought’ and ‘writing’ and (c) ‘report’, ‘presentation’ and ‘representation’.

Key Words: direct discourse/speech/thought/writing • discourse report/presentation/representation • faithfulness • indirect discourse/speech/thought/writing • verbatim quotation

Language and Literature, Vol. 11, No. 4, 325-355 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/096394700201100403


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				V. Sotirova Connectives in Free Indirect Style: Continuity or Shift? Language and Literature, August 1, 2004; 13(3): 216 - 234. [Abstract] [PDF]

				G. Hall The Year's Work in Stylistics: 2002 Language and Literature, November 1, 2003; 12(4): 353 - 370. [PDF]

				M. Kyto and T. Walker The Linguistic Study of Early Modern English Speech-Related Texts: How "Bad" can "Bad" Data Be? Journal of English Linguistics, September 1, 2003; 31(3): 221 - 248. [Abstract] [PDF]