This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Twose, G. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

What's in a clause?

Milton's participial style revisited

In this article, I aim to identify and explicate stylistic distinctiveness in the use of -ed clauses in parts of Milton's Paradise Lost, in the process testing findings outlined in a 1968 article by Seymour Chatman. I compare the frequency of occurrence of the clause type in the Milton texts with that in a constructed corpus of Early Modern English poetry, and with that in the Helsinki corpus. I measure differences in usage of the clause type by focusing on the use of -ed clauses in stretched chains of control, and on the way adverbially functioning -ed clauses map onto conceptual semantic space. I demonstrate how literary effects are conditioned and enabled by the clause type's properties as outlined in cross-linguistic studies. I prove that in the data analysed Milton's use of -ed clauses is a distinctive feature of his style.

Key Words: chains of control • desententialization • discourse structure • figure—ground • free adjuncts • semantic variability • syntactic unrelatedness

Language and Literature, Vol. 17, No. 1, 77-96 (2008)
DOI: 10.1177/0963947007085056


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. Gavins The year's work in stylistics 2008 Language and Literature, November 1, 2009; 18(4): 367 - 383. [PDF]