Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Language and Literature
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Benwell, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

‘A pathetic and racist and awful character’: ethnomethodological approaches to the reception of diasporic fiction

Bethan Benwell

University of Stirling, Scotland, UK, b.m.benwell{at}stir.ac.uk

In this article I report on findings from an ongoing research project into the activities of a transnational range of book groups reading the same series of ‘diasporic’ novels. Rather than relying upon speculations as to how readers respond to text-immanent cues, this project conceives reading as a socially situated, localized activity, contingent upon the context in which it is produced. Empirical approaches to literary reception (whether historical, experimental, or ethnographic) have rarely taken full account of the conditions in which reception data is produced. An ethnomethodological analysis of transcribed book group sessions illuminates the ‘social order’ of particular book groups, their implicit values and systems of accountability, and their careful management and negotiation of subjective experience. This contributes to a complex understanding of the processes of literary interpretation, allowing linguistic studies of reading to complement sociological reception studies.

Key Words: book groups • commonsense anti-racism discourses • ethnomethodology • Levy • Andrea • reception theory • Small Island

Language and Literature, Vol. 18, No. 3, 300-315 (2009)
DOI: 10.1177/0963947009105855


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Language and LiteratureHome page
D. Allington and J. Swann
Researching literary reading as social practice
Language and Literature, August 1, 2009; 18(3): 219 - 230.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Language and LiteratureHome page
A. Lang
Reading race in Small Island: discourse deviation, schemata and the textual encounter
Language and Literature, August 1, 2009; 18(3): 316 - 330.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Language and LiteratureHome page
G. Hall
Texts, readers -- and real readers
Language and Literature, August 1, 2009; 18(3): 331 - 337.
[PDF]


Home page
Language and LiteratureHome page
G. Myers
Stylistics and 'reading-in-talk'
Language and Literature, August 1, 2009; 18(3): 338 - 344.
[PDF]