This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Widdowson, H.G. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Discourse analysis: a critical view

University of London, University of Essex UK

Discourse analysis is in vogue as a field of enquiry, particularly in the guise of critical discourse analysis, which employs procedures not essentially different from literary criticism to identify ideological bias in texts. This article argues that, perhaps as a consequence, there is a good deal of conceptual confusion in the field. One example is the uncertainty of the scope of description, which is reflected in the ambiguity of the term 'function' and the failure to distinguish between text and discourse. Another is the tendency to equate social and linguistic theory with political commitment which raises the question of the relationship between analysis and interpretation. It is argued that this confusion makes suspect some of the principles and practices of critical discourse analysis, and calls into question the validity of the notion of authentic language currently prevalent in language pedagogy.

Key Words: analysis • airthenticity • commitment • political • discourse • effect • force • function • interpretation • reference • text

Language and Literature, Vol. 4, No. 3, 157-172 (1995)
DOI: 10.1177/096394709500400301


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. N. Al-Ali Religious affiliations and masculine power in Jordanian wedding invitation genre Discourse Society, November 1, 2006; 17(6): 691 - 714. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. Barry, B. Carroll, and H. Hansen To Text or Context? Endotextual, Exotextual, and Multi-textual Approaches to Narrative and Discursive Organizational Studies Organization Studies, August 1, 2006; 27(8): 1091 - 1110. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Pearce Informalization in UK party election broadcasts 1966-97 Language and Literature, February 1, 2005; 14(1): 65 - 90. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. J. Weber The critical practices of Henry Widdowson Language and Literature, May 1, 2002; 11(2): 153 - 160. [PDF]

				S. Slembrouck Explanation, Interpretation and Critique in the Analysis of Discourse Critique of Anthropology, March 1, 2001; 21(1): 33 - 57. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. DE BEAUGRANDE Discourse Studies and the Ideology of `Liberalism' Discourse Studies, August 1, 1999; 1(3): 259 - 295. [Abstract] [PDF]

				U. Clark and S. Zyngier Women beware women: detective fiction and critical discourse stylistics Language and Literature, January 1, 1998; 7(2): 141 - 158. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Toolan What is critical discourse analysis and why are people saying such terrible things about it?1 Language and Literature, January 1, 1997; 6(2): 83 - 103. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. Piirainen-Marsh Book Reviews Discourse Society, July 1, 1996; 7(3): 444 - 446.

				N. Fairclough A reply to Henry Widdowson's 'Discourse analysis: a critical view' Language and Literature, January 1, 1996; 5(1): 49 - 56. [PDF]