Language and Literature

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Herman, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Language and Literature, Vol. 15, No. 4, 357-380 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/0963947006068654

Genette meets Vygotsky: narrative embedding and distributed intelligence

David Herman

Ohio State University, USA

Framed tales, or stories within stories, have garnered considerable attention from theorists of narrative in recent years. By and large, however, story analysts have not sought to account for why the practice of narrative embedding has persisted so long - or why it is so widespread - in the world’s folk traditions and written literatures. Using William Wordsworth’s The Ruined Cottage as its tutor-text, this article advances a broadly cognitive explanation for the pervasiveness and persistence of narrative embedding across so many different storytelling situations. My central claim is that, in conjunction with the cognitive activities of their interpreters, framed narratives such as The Ruined Cottage constitute intelligent systems - systems that both stage and facilitate the process of shared thinking about past events and about one’s own and other minds. Such systems propagate experiential frames - specifically, the experiences of character-narrators - across time and space. By contrast, in a story that does not involve narrative embedding, there will be a net decrease in the capacity of the system to communicate representations originating from sources potentially quite widely separated in space and time. Narrative embedding thus increases the distributional reach of a framed tale, enhancing the overall power of the knowledge-generating system to which it lends structure. Adapting Barbara Rogoff’s (1990) definition of intelligence as the socially supported ability to solve problems grounded in particular domains of activity, I explore how framed narratives can help distribute intelligence both synchronically (across regions of space and participants and material artifacts within those regions) and diachronically (across different temporal phases of a given spatial region).

Key Words: cognitive narratology • empathy • framed narrative • narrative levels • socially distributed cognition • Theory of Mind • Wordsworth • William


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Language and LiteratureHome page
J. Gavins
Review Article: The year's work in stylistics 2006
Language and Literature, November 1, 2007; 16(4): 389 - 403.
[PDF]