Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Language and Literature
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Halsey, K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

‘Folk stylistics’ and the history of reading: a discussion of method

Katie Halsey

Institute of English Studies, University of London, UK, keh22{at}cantab.net

The Reading Experience Database 1450—1945 contains more than 25,000 pieces of evidence about reading habits and practices over five centuries, and of these, more than 1500 directly discuss the literary style of the works read, while others make indirect comments on style. This evidence shows literary critics and common readers alike commenting on issues of ‘good’ or ‘imitable’ style; describing how easy the work is to read aloud, recording their impressions of the ‘morality’ of the style; identifying anonymous authors by their style; and making literary judgements on the basis of style. By tracing these remarks over a long historical period (1450 to 1945), we can reconstruct the prevailing stylistic concerns of individual readers and communities of readers, and test grand historical or literary narratives against the everyday experiences of common readers. This article focuses on the period 1800—1945, and considers the ways in which the historicist and evidence-based methods of the new sub-discipline of the history of reading might be used to complement traditional stylistic analyses and methods.

Key Words: actual readers • affective fallacy • Austen • Jane • history of reading • hypothetical readers • morality in literature • 19th century • reading aloud • style • Woolf • Virginia

Language and Literature, Vol. 18, No. 3, 231-246 (2009)
DOI: 10.1177/0963947009105851


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Language and LiteratureHome page
D. Allington and J. Swann
Researching literary reading as social practice
Language and Literature, August 1, 2009; 18(3): 219 - 230.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Language and LiteratureHome page
J. Swann and D. Allington
Reading groups and the language of literary texts: a case study in social reading
Language and Literature, August 1, 2009; 18(3): 247 - 264.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Language and LiteratureHome page
K. Absillis
'From now on we speak civilized Dutch': the authors of Flanders, the language of the Netherlands, and the readers of A. Manteau
Language and Literature, August 1, 2009; 18(3): 265 - 280.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Language and LiteratureHome page
B. Benwell
'A pathetic and racist and awful character': ethnomethodological approaches to the reception of diasporic fiction
Language and Literature, August 1, 2009; 18(3): 300 - 315.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Language and LiteratureHome page
G. Hall
Texts, readers -- and real readers
Language and Literature, August 1, 2009; 18(3): 331 - 337.
[PDF]


Home page
Language and LiteratureHome page
G. Myers
Stylistics and 'reading-in-talk'
Language and Literature, August 1, 2009; 18(3): 338 - 344.
[PDF]